In a perfect democracy, at least 50% of people would support every decision.

The U.S. falls short of this goal.

Activate to continue

Spoken For.
House vote: H.R. 1927 // January 8, 2016

Fairness in Class Action Litigation and Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act of 2016

Sponsor: ROBERT GOODLATTE (R-VA)

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the federal judicial code to prohibit federal courts from certifying any proposed class seeking monetary relief for personal injury or economic loss unless the party seeking to maintain such a class action affirmatively demonstrates that each proposed class member suffered an injury of the same type and scope as the injury of the named class representatives. A court's certification of such a class must include a determination, based on a rigorous analysis of the evidence presented, that the requirements of this Act have been satisfied. (Sec. 3) The bill also amends federal bankruptcy law concerning a trust formed under a reorganization plan following the discharge in bankruptcy of a debtor corporation in order to assume the debtor's liability with respect to claims seeking recovery for personal injury, wrongful death, or property damage allegedly caused by the presence of, or exposure to, asbestos or asbestos-containing products.

Law Topic assigned by the Congressional Research Service.

Who won, and how much of the country was behind them

Won the vote · Nay

211 votes, representing 120,461,464 people48.4%of U.S. adults

Lost the vote · Yea

158 votes, representing 90,583,632 people36.4%of U.S. adults

The dotted gap is 15.2% of U.S. adults whose member did not vote, voted “present,” or whose seat was vacant.

Share of U.S. adults represented, the House. The winning side fell 1.6 points short of a majority of the country.
SideOutcomeVotesShare of U.S. adults
NayWon21148.4%
YeaLost15836.4%
Not represented on this questionNo position taken015.2%